備註請放最後面 違者新聞文章刪除
1.媒體來源:
News abc
2.記者署名:
Eric Tlozek, Orly Halpern and Allyson Horn
3.完整新聞標題
Israeli forces accused of killing their own citizens under the 'Hannibal
Directive' during October 7 chaos
以色列軍方被指控在10/7當天依命令殺害自己的市民
4.完整新聞內文:
"Hannibal at Erez, dispatch a Zik [attack drone]," came the command on
October 7.
Those words, reported by Israeli newspaper Haaretz in July, confirm what many
Israelis have feared since the Hamas attacks on October 7 in southern Israel.
在10月7日，有命令下達：“在Erez的Hannibal，派遣Zik [攻擊無人機]。”
以色列報紙《哈亞雷茲》在7月報導了這些話，證實了許多以色列人自10月7日哈馬斯襲擊
南部以色列以來的恐懼。
Israeli forces have killed their own citizens.
Israeli authorities say more than 800 civilians and around 300 soldiers were
killed on October 7.
A number of Israeli hostages have since died in Gaza.
Israelis are still reeling from the horror and pain of the Hamas-led terror
attack, which was the bloodiest single day in Israel's history.
But the Israeli military is coming under increasing pressure to reveal just
how many of their own citizens were killed by Israeli soldiers, pilots and
police in the confusion of the Hamas attack on southern Israeli communities.
Survivors and relatives have been asking not just "what went wrong", but
whether the military invoked the controversial — and supposedly rescinded —
"Hannibal Directive".
以色列軍隊已經殺害了自己國家的公民。
以色列當局表示，10月7日共有超過800名平民和約300名士兵遇難。
隨後，一些以色列人質在加薩地帶也死於非命。
以色列人仍在承受哈馬斯主導的恐怖襲擊帶來的恐懼和痛苦，這是以色列歷史上最血腥的
一天。
但以色列軍方正面臨越來越大的壓力，對於揭露在哈馬斯襲擊南部以色列社區的混亂中，
以國軍人、飛行員和警察究竟造成了多少自己國公民的死亡。
倖存者和親屬不僅在詢問“到底發生了什麼錯誤”，還在質疑軍方是否啟用了有爭議的—
—且應該已經取消的——“Hannibal命令”。
What is the Hannibal Directive?
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said the directive was named at random by a
computer program, but Hannibal was the famous Carthaginian general who took
poison rather than be captured by the Romans.
The doctrine, written in 1986 in response to the kidnapping of Israeli
soldiers in Lebanon, gave permission for Israeli forces to fire on enemies
holding their comrades hostage — even at risk to those hostages.
Its authors said the directive did not allow captives to be killed, but
critics say that over time an interpretation spread through the military that
it was better to kill comrades than to allow their capture.
什麼是Hannibal命令？
以色列國防軍（IDF）表示，這項指令是由電腦隨機命名的，但Hannibal是著名的迦太基
將軍，他寧願服毒自殺也不願被羅馬人俘虜。
這一指導方針於1986年制定，以回應在黎巴嫩以色列士兵被綁架的事件。它允許以色列軍
隊在敵人扣押其同袍的情況下開火，即使這可能危及人質的安全。
該命令的起草者表示，命令不允許殺害人質，但批評者指出，隨著時間的推移，軍隊內部
出現了這樣的解釋，即寧可殺死自己的同袍，也不願意讓他們被俘。
"They interpreted it as if they are [meant] to intentionally, deliberately
kill the soldier in order to foil the attempted abduction, and that was
wrong," Israeli philosopher Asa Kasher, who wrote the IDF code of ethics,
told the ABC."That is legally wrong and morally wrong and ethically wrong,
it's wrong on all accounts."
以色列哲學家阿薩·卡舍（Asa Kasher），他曾編寫過IDF的倫理守則，對ABC新聞說：“
他們將其解釋為，應該在考慮後故意殺死士兵，以阻止綁架，這是錯誤的。這在法律上是
錯誤的，在道德上是錯誤的，從倫理上講也是錯誤的，這在各方面都是錯誤的。”
After October 7, there were some testimonies from Israeli civilians and
military personnel that Israeli forces responding to the Hamas attack killed
their own citizens.
Nevertheless, many Israelis and supporters of Israel condemned anyone who
suggested it had occurred, before more testimonies and Israeli media reports
confirmed it was true.
The IDF has not confirmed or denied a version of the Hannibal directive was
applied on October 7, only saying it is one of many things from that day
under investigation.
In response to questions from the ABC, the Israeli military provided a
statement saying: "The IDF is currently focused on eliminating the threat
from the terrorist organisation Hamas."
"Questions of this kind will be looked into at a later stage."
在10月7日之後，一些以色列平民和軍人證實，以色列軍隊在因應哈馬斯襲擊時，殺害了
自己的公民。
儘管如此，許多以色列人和以色列的支持者譴責了那些提出此事的人，直到更多證詞和以
色列媒體報導證實了這一事實。
以色列國防軍尚未確認或否認10月7日是否用了Hannibal命令，只表示那一天的許多事情
正在調查中。
對於ABC新聞的提問，以色列軍方提供了一份聲明，稱：“IDF目前專注於消除恐怖組織哈
馬斯的威脅。”
“這類問題將在後續階段進行調查。”
'This was a mass Hannibal'
In July, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz revealed commanders in the IDF gave
the order to fire on troops who had been captured by Hamas at three separate
locations, explicitly referencing the Hannibal Directive.
One former Israeli officer, Air Force Colonel Nof Erez, told a Haaretz
podcast the directive was not specifically ordered but was "apparently
applied" by responding aircrews.
Panicked, operating without their normal command structure and unable to
coordinate with ground forces, they fired on vehicles returning to Gaza,
knowing they were likely carrying hostages.
"This was a mass Hannibal. It was tons and tons of openings in the fence, and
thousands of people in every type of vehicle, some with hostages and some
without," Colonel Erez said.
Air force pilots described to Yedioth Ahronot newspaper the firing of
"tremendous" amounts of ammunition on October 7 at people attempting to cross
the border between Gaza and Israel.
"Twenty-eight fighter helicopters shot over the course of the day all of the
ammunition in their bellies, in renewed runs to rearm. We are talking about
hundreds of 30-millimetre cannon mortars and Hellfire missiles," reporter
Yoav Zeitoun said.
"The frequency of fire at the thousands of terrorists was enormous at the
start, and only at a certain point did the pilots begin to slow their attacks
and carefully choose the targets."
Tank officers have also confirmed they applied their own interpretation of
the directive when firing on vehicles returning to Gaza, potentially with
Israelis on board.
"My gut feeling told me that they [soldiers from another tank] could be on
them," tank captain Bar Zonshein told Israel's Channel 13.
Captain Zonshein is asked: "So you might be killing them with that action?
They are your soldiers."
"Right," he replied, "but I decided that this is the right decision, that
it's better to stop the kidnapping, that they won't be taken."
Investigative journalist Ronen Bergman wrote for Yedioth Ahronot newspaper
that the military had enacted the Hannibal Directive at midnight on October 7.
"The IDF instructed all its fighting units in practice to follow the
'Hannibal Directive', although without clearly mentioning this explicit
name," he said.
"The instruction is to stop 'at all costs' any attempt by Hamas terrorists to
return to Gaza, using language very similar to the original 'Hannibal
Directive', despite repeated assurances by the security establishment that
the procedure has been cancelled."
Bergman's investigation found 70 vehicles were destroyed by Israeli aircraft
and tanks to prevent them being driven into Gaza, killing everyone inside.
"It is not clear at this point how many of the abductees were killed due to
the activation of this [Hannibal] order on October 7," he wrote.
The original Hannibal Directive, while confidential, reportedly recommends
small arms and sniper fire towards enemies holding hostages — and not to use
bombs, missiles or tank shells.
“這是一場大規模的Hannibal行動”
在7月，以色列報紙《哈亞雷茲》揭露，以色列國防軍的指揮官下達了在三個不同地點對
被哈馬斯俘獲的部隊開火的命令，明確提及了Hannibal命令。
一位前以色列軍官、空軍上校諾夫·埃雷茲（Nof Erez）告訴《哈亞雷茲》播客，該命令
並未被具體下達，但被回應的空中部隊“明顯使用”。
由於恐慌、在沒有正常指揮結構的情況下操作，且無法與地面部隊協調，他們在知道這些
車輛很可能運載著人質的情況下，向返回加薩的車輛開火。
“這是一場大規模的Hannibal行動。圍欄上有大量漏洞，數以千計的人在各種車輛中，有
些載著人質，有些則沒有”埃雷茲上校說。
空軍飛行員向《以色列報》描述了10月7日向試圖穿越加沙與以色列邊界的人群發射“巨
量”彈藥的情況。
記者Yoav Zeitoun說：“28架戰鬥直升機在一天之內射光了它們的所有彈藥，不斷進行補
給。我們說的是數百枚30毫米口徑炮彈和地獄火導彈。”
“起初對數千名恐怖分子的開火頻率非常高，只有在某一時間過後，飛行員才開始減少攻
擊並仔細選擇目標。”
坦克指揮官也確認，他們在向返回加薩對可能載有以色列人的車輛開火時使用了自己對命
令的解釋。
坦克指揮官巴爾·宗希（Bar Zonshein）告訴以色列第13頻道：“我的直覺告訴我，那
些 [來自另一輛坦克的士兵] 可能在他們身上。”
當被問到：“所以你有可能會在這個行動中殺死他們？他們是你的士兵。”時，宗希回答
：“對，但我確定這是正確的決定，阻止綁架會比較好，他們不會被俘。”
調查記者羅嫩·伯曼（Ronen Bergman）在《以色列報》上寫道，軍方在10月7日午夜啟用
了Hannibal命令。
“IDF指示所有作戰單位實際上遵循‘Hannibal命令’，雖然沒有明確提及這個具體名稱
，”他說。
“命令是‘不惜一切代價’阻止哈馬斯恐怖分子返回加薩，使用的語氣與原本的‘
Hannibal命令’非常相似，儘管安全部門一再保證該程序已被取消。”
伯曼的調查發現，以色列的飛機和坦克摧毀了70輛車輛，以防它們駛入加薩，殺死了車內
的所有人。
“目前尚不清楚有多少被擄人員是因為10月7日啟用這個 [Hannibal] 命令而被殺害的，
”他寫道。
原本的Hannibal命令雖然是機密的，但據報導建議對持有俘虜的敵人使用小型武器和狙擊
火力，而不是使用炸彈、導彈或坦克炮彈。
5.完整新聞連結 (或短網址)不可用YAHOO、LINE、MSN等轉載媒體:
https://reurl.cc/GppR0x
6.備註:
整件事情太過駭人聽聞，所以我擷取部分內文出來供大家判斷真偽，
news abc算大間的報社了，應該不至於憑空造謠。
很難想像這些軍人是用甚麼心情在轟炸自己人，
似乎歐洲人的命對於國家來說也是可以捨棄的，
天下的賤民一般可憐，唉
--
