之前有稍微測過AMD EPYC 7642
由於工作繁忙的關係就沒有再多測幾個benchmark
現在總算有時間多跑幾個測試
corona 1.3
https://i.imgur.com/gNRp65W.jpeg
v-ray
https://i.imgur.com/4tBXIPY.jpeg
AIDA64
https://i.imgur.com/PIUi1yb.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/tz0olxL.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/I6EU17L.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/tzY77za.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/hb7FZ7Z.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/hqv4Sxg.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/39ADt3i.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/yaTUjEo.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/19QT6um.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/VD44cZ1.jpeg
挖rtm幣(ghostrider演算法)
https://i.imgur.com/WYYU3OW.jpeg
blender
https://i.imgur.com/MoGSfdj.jpeg
https://opendata.blender.org/benchmarks/e9df73b4-ba91-4fae-9e0a-e42d0e3136f7/
https://i.imgur.com/R2Y3Pc5.jpeg
之前跑cinebench效果不好，
大概只比13900K多了10~20%的分數，
改跑其他渲染軟體效果還不錯
corona 1.3 EPYC 7642 17M rays/s比7950X的12M rays/s快了近40%
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKKg5KEqPqU
v-ray EPYC 7642 42342 vsamples比14900K 的22331 vsamples快了近90%
https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-7000-wx-series-content-creation-review/
至於AIDA64的CPU分數普普通通
但FPU的表現還不錯
挖rtm幣 AVG 9097 h/s比7950X的4741 h/s快了近90%
blender EPYC 7642 736比14900K的552快了近30%
https://opendata.blender.org/benchmarks/query/?device_name=Intel%20Core%20i9-14900K&blender_version=3.2.1&group_by=device_name
用了幾個月感覺相當滿意，
但最近又在淘寶發現新玩意AMD EPYC 7K62一樣48核心96線程只要2399RMB
比我當初買AMD EPYC 7642的3199RMB還要便宜不少
而且base頻率還高300MHz (AMD EPYC 7642 2.3GHz vs AMD EPYC 7K62 2.6GHz)
算了，就當早買早享受
--
