Fw: [新聞] 遊戲開發商Wolfire針對Steam平台發起反壟

Steam

40301

Judge dismisses antitrust lawsuit filed against Valve
https://www.pcgamer.com/judge-dismisses-antitrust-lawsuit-filed-against-valve/

之前Valve向法官要求駁回,因為證據完全不足。

最新消息就是法官同意了Valve的看法,所以這個反壟斷案被駁回了。

駁回的理由在這

The ruling, available in full on CourtListener, says Wolfire's lawsuit falls
short on two separate points. First, the claim that Valve is illegally tying
the Steam store to the platform—essentially, using the near-monopoly of
Steam as a library, launcher, and social media platform to force people to
buy games through the Steam storefront—is rejected because the allegations
in the lawsuit suggest that the Steam platform and storefront are in fact "a
single product within the integrated game platform and transaction market."

Wolfire's lawsuit also claims that Valve uses its near-monopoly to charge an
excessive fee to sellers—30%—that wouldn't be sustainable in a competitive
marketplace. That claim resulted in some interesting conversations earlier
this year, but the judge rejected the argument, noting that Valve's take has
remained unchanged throughout Steam's history, even as other online stores
charging lower percentages have come and gone.

"Therefore, it would appear that the market reality, at least as plead, is
that [Valve's] fee is commensurate with the Steam Platform's value to game
publishers," the ruling states.

====

反正大概又涉及什麼法律問題,看有沒有高手要幫大家解惑。

--
「......歡迎大家光臨天象館。」
「這裡有著無論何時都決不會消失的,美麗的無窮光輝。
「滿天的星星們在等待著大家的到來。」
── 星野夢美 ﹝星之夢﹞ ──

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.233.168.250 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Steam/M.1637410458.A.B35.html
oas1樓誰? 靠當鬆棍打廣告嗎? 11/20 20:21
y18965472樓鬆棍洩師傅 11/20 20:23
本人3樓你查標題回去看當初討論就知道了 11/20 20:23
本人4樓那時板上討論好多篇呢 11/20 20:24
nagilaman5樓開發商告平台壟斷市場? 是不是搞錯了什麼 11/20 20:24
pokiman6樓pc上那麼多平台原本就不可能成案除非只有steam獨佔pc 11/20 20:33
bearching7樓覺得定義平台獨佔其實不容易吧 ,如果指收取30%是獨佔 11/20 20:35
bearching8樓行為,那Valve光是提出維護遊戲系統的成本報告,還有 11/20 20:35
bearching9樓同樣的遊戲如刺客教條,都在各平台發行,跟許多慈善包 11/20 20:35
bearching10樓或是賣key網站都買得到這點,都很難讓人下定論說具獨 11/20 20:35
bearching11樓佔行為 11/20 20:35
pokiman12樓steam也沒有禁止賣家在其他平台販售你要怎麼告壟斷,更 11/20 20:36
pokiman13樓何況steam是收費較高的一方,正常被告壟斷的是殺價競爭 11/20 20:36
pokiman14樓的一方,但其他平台太廢 11/20 20:36
Yijhen052515樓Steam一直以來都維持30%都沒變過 11/20 20:38
pokiman16樓steam每天平均活躍用戶五千六百萬人維護伺服器這些費用s 11/20 20:45
pokiman17樓team也沒像家機有收月費你就能連線對戰了 11/20 20:45
ssarc18樓訟棍本來就沒希望能贏,他就是要跟你打爛仗打到你煩,逼你 11/20 20:48
ssarc19樓和解開特權,萬一再凹到個神奇法官他就賺翻了 11/20 20:48
oas20樓喔喔 原來是之前版上文章~看了一下 回憶都來了~XD 看到髒東西 11/20 21:14
lhy810452221樓看到分享仔差點沒笑死 跟別人乞討說是分享XD 11/20 21:37
sonans22樓Steam太霸道,司法部怎麼不像當年告微軟分拆一樣去告steam 11/20 21:47
sonans23樓當年微軟被告了後就軟了,才興起了google跟apple。 11/20 21:48
ssarc24樓說他壟斷的是看不起EA、BZ、UBI等等公司嗎? 11/20 22:00
spfy25樓Steam和微軟比 G胖睡覺都會偷笑 11/20 22:01
horard26樓估計就是以法律戰來拉扯~有拚有機會? 11/20 22:06
pokiman27樓steam不是上市公司光這點很多法條都拿她沒辦法啊 11/20 22:08
bearching28樓微軟用系統綁IE所以被告到軟,但steam本質上就跟這差滿 11/20 23:01
bearching29樓多的,我覺得本質上不同大概是關鍵吧 怎麼樣都沒辦法 11/20 23:01
sonans30樓Valve也用Half-life跟Portal綁Steam。 11/20 23:08